There is a very interesting distinction I noticed between nylon strings and poly strings. (Nylon strings would include synthetic gut and multifilaments)
When tension is gradually increased on the same piece of test string, nylon and poly stretches very differently. I clamped a piece of string and marked out exactly 20cm before any tension is applied. Then I gradually applied a tension of 15kg, 20kg, 30kg, 40kg and then back to 30kg and finally 20kg. The initial length of 20cm was measured at each stage and recorded.
The graph below shows roughly how nylon and poly strings would stretch.
Nylon is represented by the thinner line and poly the thicker line. Nylon displays a high initial stretch of about 8-10% even at a low tension of 15kg (33lbs). With additional tension, nylon stretches very slowly, adding only about 2% length each time as the amount of weight increases.
Poly does not stretch much at low tensions. So far, the poly I've tried starts stretching at about 40+ lbs. The way poly stretches is totally different from nylon. Poly stretches more at the later stages of higher weights. And then suddenly, as denoted in the graph at point X, poly fails and either suddenly snaps or deforms to a piece of lifeless string.
When both strings are completely removed from any tension, nylons recovers from most of the stretch. Poly, however, retains most of the length stretched.
This difference in behaviour has very important implications on how both strings should be strung and at what tension. Naturally, the durability of both strings would also be drastically different.
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Dunlop AG200 + Full Multifilament @ 52/54 lbs
While bouncing a ball on the floor using the racket, the RPM/PSG hybrid stringbed felt springy and spongy. I couldn't decide whether to try playing a game with it.
When I found out that the racket was last strung about 3 months ago, I cut the strings immediately. Very few poly strings can last 8 hours of playtime. Even when strung and unused, poly can lose its playability in as little as two or three weeks. My thoughts were, since I have new strings and a machine, why risk any discomfort?
To me, multi strings are the safest bet. It is soft, comfortable and quite durable compared to most polys. Naturally, multi is my preferred string when testing rackets since I am familiar with how that string performs. Below pic shows the main strings completed.
18 by 20 in a 95 sq inch means a much denser stringbed compared to 16 by 18. Although the tension is "only" 52/54 lbs, this stringbed stiffness (~38 kg/cm) is the stiffest that I am going to try since I re-started playing tennis.
Playtest:
- the dense stringbed provides exceptionally good ball control
- at 52/54 lbs, I could do full swings without fear of hitting it long
- surprisingly, it is not difficult to generate spin at all
- the full multi bed is very soft, comfortable and yet crisp
- i could not feel any tension drop after an hour of hard hitting
- i enjoy this thin-beamed 95 sq in more than the 100 sq in 500 Tour
- this racket plays and feels very similar to my PSC6.1
- my friend that tested this said it feels like the Dunlop 200G
- overall I like this heavier 95 sq in much more than the 500 Tour
When I found out that the racket was last strung about 3 months ago, I cut the strings immediately. Very few poly strings can last 8 hours of playtime. Even when strung and unused, poly can lose its playability in as little as two or three weeks. My thoughts were, since I have new strings and a machine, why risk any discomfort?
To me, multi strings are the safest bet. It is soft, comfortable and quite durable compared to most polys. Naturally, multi is my preferred string when testing rackets since I am familiar with how that string performs. Below pic shows the main strings completed.
18 by 20 in a 95 sq inch means a much denser stringbed compared to 16 by 18. Although the tension is "only" 52/54 lbs, this stringbed stiffness (~38 kg/cm) is the stiffest that I am going to try since I re-started playing tennis.
- the dense stringbed provides exceptionally good ball control
- at 52/54 lbs, I could do full swings without fear of hitting it long
- surprisingly, it is not difficult to generate spin at all
- the full multi bed is very soft, comfortable and yet crisp
- i could not feel any tension drop after an hour of hard hitting
- i enjoy this thin-beamed 95 sq in more than the 100 sq in 500 Tour
- this racket plays and feels very similar to my PSC6.1
- my friend that tested this said it feels like the Dunlop 200G
- overall I like this heavier 95 sq in much more than the 500 Tour
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
Bye Dunlop AG500 Tour... Hi Dunlop AG200...
Less than two months ago, I bought a new Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour thinking that I'll need a lighter racket with a larger face since I've stopped playing for so long.
Despite my best attempts, I could not get used to the racket. It felt too light. And there was not much space left to add lead tape! The face was too big, even though it was only 5 sq inch more than my usual 95 sq inch rackets. I couldn't hit the sweetspot regularly enough. So I searched online and traded it for the heavier and smaller face (95 sq inch) Dunlop Aerogel 200.
I like the thinner beam of the Aerogel 200. It looks less bulky. Although heavier, the stock specs at 11.9oz (337g) still feels light. To beef it up further, I added lead tape. You can see the 2 strips at the inner side of the frame.
I finally managed to bring it up to the same weight as my PSC6.1.
This racket came with a hybrid of RPM and Prince Synthetic Gut @ 52/54 lbs. I'll have to take it for a test drive before I can decide how to string up this new stick.
Despite my best attempts, I could not get used to the racket. It felt too light. And there was not much space left to add lead tape! The face was too big, even though it was only 5 sq inch more than my usual 95 sq inch rackets. I couldn't hit the sweetspot regularly enough. So I searched online and traded it for the heavier and smaller face (95 sq inch) Dunlop Aerogel 200.
I like the thinner beam of the Aerogel 200. It looks less bulky. Although heavier, the stock specs at 11.9oz (337g) still feels light. To beef it up further, I added lead tape. You can see the 2 strips at the inner side of the frame.
I finally managed to bring it up to the same weight as my PSC6.1.
This racket came with a hybrid of RPM and Prince Synthetic Gut @ 52/54 lbs. I'll have to take it for a test drive before I can decide how to string up this new stick.
Monday, 26 November 2012
Spin Competition Day!!!
Having experienced the incredible spin from poly strings (link) and from kevlar (link), I thought maybe it would be interesting to compare the spin potential of different strings side-by-side rather than one at a time.
So, I re-strung two rackets this time:
- Pro Staff Classic 6.1 with Kevlar / Synthetic Gut hybrid
- Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour with Full Poly
Before poly strings became popular, kevlar / synthetic gut hybrid has been the de facto king of spin. Few strings come close to its spin prowess. So I think this is going to be an exciting "competition".
Here's a pic of the PSC 6.1 completed. Afraid that the stringbed would play too stiff, I skipped the outer two main strings and outer two cross strings and converted the stringbed to a 14 by 16. Another reason is the slightly denser stringbed of the PSC 6.1 may give the Dunlop a slight advantage in spin generation potential. I hope this even out things a little.
Here's the Dunlop 500 Tour pics. This is done as a straightforward 2-piece job on the full 16 by 18.
Weaving the last cross. It's just so difficult to weave full poly!
Results:
PSC 6.1 + Kevlar / Syn Gut
- feels incredibly soft and powerful with absolutely no trampoline
- control was excellent and I was able to hit the corners accurately
- serves and volleys were good and very stable
- tension holding remains excellent after 30 min
- spin is excellent
- the racket sweetspot felt very large and easy to find
Dunlop 500 Tour + Shaped Poly / Soft Poly
- full poly wins in spin generation by a very slim margin
- stringbed felt soft, nice and powerful
- topspin increases automatically with harder hits and curls ball down
- a slight bouncy feel creeped in after about 15 min of hitting
- after 15 min, I could feel slight tension loss and string vibrations
- vibrations worsened after 30 min even with dampener
- started feeling harsh with buzzing vibrations which affected me
So overall, kevlar / synthetic gut hybrid gave me the better experience even though it lost in spin generation by a slim margin to full poly.
So, I re-strung two rackets this time:
- Pro Staff Classic 6.1 with Kevlar / Synthetic Gut hybrid
- Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour with Full Poly
Before poly strings became popular, kevlar / synthetic gut hybrid has been the de facto king of spin. Few strings come close to its spin prowess. So I think this is going to be an exciting "competition".
Here's a pic of the PSC 6.1 completed. Afraid that the stringbed would play too stiff, I skipped the outer two main strings and outer two cross strings and converted the stringbed to a 14 by 16. Another reason is the slightly denser stringbed of the PSC 6.1 may give the Dunlop a slight advantage in spin generation potential. I hope this even out things a little.
Here's the Dunlop 500 Tour pics. This is done as a straightforward 2-piece job on the full 16 by 18.
Results:
PSC 6.1 + Kevlar / Syn Gut
- feels incredibly soft and powerful with absolutely no trampoline
- control was excellent and I was able to hit the corners accurately
- serves and volleys were good and very stable
- tension holding remains excellent after 30 min
- spin is excellent
- the racket sweetspot felt very large and easy to find
Dunlop 500 Tour + Shaped Poly / Soft Poly
- full poly wins in spin generation by a very slim margin
- stringbed felt soft, nice and powerful
- topspin increases automatically with harder hits and curls ball down
- a slight bouncy feel creeped in after about 15 min of hitting
- after 15 min, I could feel slight tension loss and string vibrations
- vibrations worsened after 30 min even with dampener
- started feeling harsh with buzzing vibrations which affected me
So overall, kevlar / synthetic gut hybrid gave me the better experience even though it lost in spin generation by a slim margin to full poly.
Strings:
Pro Staff Classic 6.1 (95 sq inch, done 14x16)
Pro Supex Aramid 50 1.10mm mains @ 45lbs
Pro Supex Synthetic Gut Titan 1.25mm cross @ 50lbs
Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour (100 sq inch, done 16x18)
Pro Supex Super Nova Hex 1.23mm mains @ 47lbs
Pro Supex Big Ace Revo 1.25mm cross @ 45lbs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











